<What I felt while watching Sharplink Gaming> It feels like ConsenSys has led the 'Ethereum financial strategy' as a big trend. Sharplink Gaming has raised about 500 billion won in funds through PIPE and is steadily accumulating Ethereum, and the difference from Bitcoin's financial strategy is that Ethereum can be profitable through asset management beyond simple holding. What I'm curious about here is how to use the Ethereum collected in this way. In @SharpLinkGaming case, you can see that Figment is managing assets based on LST or LRT. Figment is one of the top validators on Ethereum, and it operates a dedicated vault for institutional investors and provides stable staking income. And projects like @Obol_Collective are helping large operators like Figment make validation more reliable and efficient. The more institutions adopt the Ethereum strategy, the more the supply and demand of ether will inevitably flow into these institutional validators. For example, if you run a node with a single validator key and a natural disaster occurs, you can lose not only your future rewards but also your staking principal. To reduce this risk, the demand for Distributed Validator Technology (DVT), an infrastructure that distributes validator keys across multiple nodes, will continue to grow. The crucial infrastructure difference between Ethereum and Suina and Solana is the decentralized computing structure. Even if the world ends, it is designed to avoid a single point of failure through at least 5~6 clients. In order for institutions to really jump on this Ethereum narrative, they need to strategize to reduce single points of failure at the validator layer, and there is a project like @Obol_Collective at the center of it. After all, I think that the more companies choose Ethereum financing strategies, the more demand for projects that help them get better at validating or make asset management easier will naturally increase.